Publication Ethics Policy

Publication Ethics Policy

Ethical standards for evaluating scientific research through academic studies :

First: Academic integrity

Only a good researcher takes into account academic integrity while preparing peer-reviewed scientific research. This aspect must be taken into account when selecting references and documenting the research .

Second: Respect for privacy

The researcher must be primarily careful to take into account the privacy element, which is considered one of the criteria for evaluating the research paper for all members of the research sample, while collecting information related to the research from them .

Third: Complete confidentiality

If the researcher collects information from different sources, he must maintain the confidentiality of this information, and he can symbolize the people who gave him the information with codes, for example .

Fourth: Taking responsibility

The researcher must bear responsibility for the procedures he carries out. Bearing responsibility is considered one of the most important controls and standards for arbitrating university research and theses. He must also bear responsibility for the results he reaches in his scientific research, and he must also explain the reasons that prompted him to conduct this study to the examinees .

Fifth: Honesty in presenting search results

The most important criteria for evaluating scientific research are honesty, objectivity, and logic when presenting the results of the scientific research. The researcher must leave his results as they are, and he should not try to make these results fit his assumptions .

Sixth: The journal has the right to take all necessary measures against those who violate the foundations and rules of scientific research ethics. Researchers must not submit works that have been previously published in other journals. They must also not submit their research to more than one journal at a time, as this is considered - in the journal's view - unacceptable behavior and contrary to the ethics of research and publication . Researchers are not entitled to publish their research in other journals except after receiving an official rejection from the journal or in the event that the journal officially approves the request to withdraw their submitted research .

Seventh: The Journal refrains from publishing any research that speaks in a sectarian manner or contains sectarian or ethnic expressions that conflict with the policy of the educational institution and human, societal and religious rights .

There are many reasons to follow ethical standards in evaluating research :

These standards enhance the goals of research, such as knowledge, truth, and avoiding error. For example, prohibiting the fabrication, falsification, or distortion of research data enhances truth and reduces error .

Ethical standards reinforce values that are essential to collaborative work because most research involves a lot of collaboration and coordination between many people in different disciplines and different institutions, such as trust, accountability, mutual respect, and fairness. Many ethical standards in research, such as guidelines for authorship , copyright , patenting policies , data sharing policies, and confidentiality rules in peer review, are designed to protect intellectual property interests while encouraging collaboration. Most researchers want to be recognized for their contributions and do not want their ideas stolen or revealed prematurely .

Several ethical standards help ensure that researchers are accountable to the public.